Accuracy of the Quebec Pre-Hospital Triage Scale (EQTPT) in Predicting the Need for Trauma Team Activation: A Retrospective Administrative Data Study
Accuracy of Pre-hospital Triage
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29173/cjen196Keywords:
Trauma, Triage, CDC-ACSCOT, ACS-6, undertriage, overtriageAbstract
Background: Trauma team activation at a Level 1 trauma centre In Quebec, Canada, is primarily at the emergency department’s staff discretion. Trauma teams may be activated prehospital, based on information provided by field paramedics or in the emergency department based on the patient’s condition on arrival. In this study, we examined over and undertriage rates based on present trauma team activation criteria. We also examined if trauma team activation, for those patients solely meeting pre-hospital major trauma criteria, would result in significant overactivation of the trauma team.
Methods: This is a single-centre retrospective medical record review. Primary ambulance transport reports from May 15, 2018 to December 31, 2020, were screened to identify patients aged ≥16 years who met pre-hospital trauma triage criteria to bypass community hospitals to arrive directly at the Level 1 trauma centre. We examined pre-hospital triage criteria, trauma team involvement, Injury Severity Scores (ISS) and final disposition. Patients were evaluated for over and undertriage and rates were compared to the rates assuming all patients were to have a trauma team activation. We considered patients overtriaged if they had a full trauma team activation but had an ISS <12 and were discharged from the emergency department. Undertriage was defined as any patient with an ISS ³12 and did not have a trauma team activation.
Results: Of the 371 patients who met study inclusion criteria, 123 (33.3%) did not meet trauma team activation criteria, while 214 (57.7%) had a trauma team activation. Of these, 49 patients (13.2%) were undertriaged and 31 patients (8.4%) were overtriaged and 25.8% of the major trauma patients (ISS ³ 12) were undertriaged. A trauma team activation for all meeting field triage criteria increased overtriage to 25.3% and brought undertriage rates to 0%, with statistically significant differences based on the Wilcoxon signed ranks test (p<0.05).
Conclusions: In this study, undertriage rates were well above 5%. Trauma team activation, based on local field trauma triage criteria adapted from the CDC-ACSCOT field triage criteria, eliminates undertriage and keeps overtriage rates below 35%. This research suggests that field triage criteria accurately predict major trauma and the need for the involvement of the trauma team and that the condition of the trauma patient in the pre-hospital setting is accurately predicting the need for advanced trauma care
References
Amiel, I., Simon, D., Merin, O., & Ziv, A. (2016). Mobile in situ simulation as a tool for evaluation and improvement of trauma treatment in the emergency department. Journal of surgical education, 73 (1), 121-128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2015.08.013
Austin, E. E., Blakely, B., Tufanaru, C., Selwood, A., Braithwaite, J., & Clay-Williams, R. (2020). Strategies to measure and improve emergency department performance: a scoping review. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med, 28(1), 55. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13049-020-00749-2
Barleycorn, D., & Lee, G. A. (2018). How effective is trauma simulation as an educational process for healthcare providers within the trauma networks? A systematic review. International emergency nursing, 40, 37-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ienj.2018.03.007
Bourgeois, J., Clark, G., Delaney, S., Grushka, J., & Knopp-Sihota, J. A. (2024). Timing of Trauma Team Involvement and the Impact on the Length of Stay and Time to Definitive Care in the Emergency Department: A Retrospective Administrative Data and Chart Review: Timing of Trauma Team Involvement. Canadian Journal of Emergency Nursing, 47(1), 30–37. https://doi.org/10.29173/cjen195
Clapper, T. C. (2013). In situ and mobile simulation: lessons learned… authentic and resource intensive. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 9(11), e551-e557. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2012.12.005
Cook, D. A., Brydges, R., Hamstra, S. J., Zendejas, B., Szostek, J. H., Wang, A. T., Erwin, P. J., & Hatala, R. (2012). Comparative effectiveness of technology-enhanced simulation versus other instructional methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis. The Journal of the Society for Simulation in Health Care, 7(5), 308 – 320. https://doi.org/10.1097/sih.0b013e3182614f95
Doumouras, A. G., Keshet, I., Nathens, A. B., Ahmed, N., & Hicks, C. M. (2014). Trauma Non-Technical Training (TNT-2): the development, piloting and multilevel assessment of a simulation-based, interprofessional curriculum for team-based trauma resuscitation. Canadian Journal of Surgery, 57(5), 354. https://doi.org/10.1503%2Fcjs.000814
Jelinek, L., Fahje, C., Immermann, C., & Elsbernd, T. (2014). The trauma report nurse: a trauma triage process improvement project. Journal of emergency nursing, 40(5), e111–e117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jen.2013.12.018
Miller, D., Crandall, C., Washington III, C., & McLaughlin, S. (2012). Improving teamwork and communication in trauma care through in situ simulations. Academic Emergency Medicine, 19 (5), 608-612. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1553-2712.2012.01354.x
Minor, S., Green, R., & Jessula, S. (2019). Crash testing the dummy: a review of in situ trauma simulation at a Canadian tertiary Centre. Canadian Journal of Surgery, 62 (4), 243. https://doi.org/10.1503%2Fcjs.008918
Rosen, M. A., Hunt, E. A., Pronovost, P. J., Federowicz, M. A., & Weaver, S. J. (2012). In situ simulation in continuing education for the health care professions: a systematic review. Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions, 32(4), 243-254. https://doi.org/10.1002/chp.21152
Walker, S. T., Sevdalis, N., McKay, A., Lambden, S., Gautama, S., Aggarwal, R., & Vincent, C. (2013). Unannounced in situ simulations: integrating training and clinical practice. BMJ Quality & Safety, 22(6), 453-458. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2012-000986
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Jeanesse Bourgeois, Dr Greg Clark, Dr Scott Delaney, Dr Jeremy Grushka, Dr Jennifer A. Knopp-Sihota
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The Canadian Journal of Emergency Nursing is published Open Access under a Creative Commons CC-BY 4.0 license. Authors retain full copyright.