Identifying and managing latent safety threats though a zone-wide emergency department in-situ multidiscipline simulation program: A quality improvement project
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.29173/cjen157Résumé
ABSTRACT
Background
Latent safety threats (LSTs) have been defined as system based issues that threaten patient safety that can materialize at any time and were previously unrecognized by healthcare providers, unit directors, or hospital administration. While LSTs such as system deficiencies, equipment failures, training, or conditions predisposing medical errors are frequently reported in the literature, a paucity was noted in the management and mitigation of these threats. The purpose of the translational simulation quality improvement project study was to utilize translational simulations to identify, manage, and mitigate future latent safety threats in our EDs.
METHODS
In 2017, 18 in-situ inter-professional simulation sessions were conducted at 11 EDs. Following each session, a survey assessment tool, created by the research team, was completed by participants to identify latent safety threats. Findings were shared with site clinical nurse educators and managers to help facilitate institutional follow up. For reporting, latent safety threats were categorized thematically and coded as either (i) resolved, (ii) ongoing, or (iii) not managed. Follow-up with sites was completed 1 year following the simulation.
RESULTS
A total n=158 LSTs were identified. The number and percentage by theme was: staff 48 (30.4%), equipment 41 (25.9%), medications 33 (20.9%), resuscitation resources 24 (15.2%), and information technology (IT) issues 12 (7.6%).Site follow-up identified that 149 LSTs were resolved and ten required ongoing work to manage. No occurrences of a LST ‘not managed’ were identified.
CONCLUSIONS
Translation simulation effectively identified latent safety threats and assisted interdisciplinary teams in the creation of a structured plan and systematic follow-up to enhance the health system and patient care. Through use of a threat mitigation strategy all identified threats were addressed while some require ongoing management.
Références
Adler, M. D., Mobley, B. L., Eppich, W. J., Lappe, M., Green, M., Mangold, K. (2018). Use of simulation to test systems and prepare staff for a new hospital transition. J Patient Safety, 14(3), 143–7. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26076076
Barlow, M., Dickie, R., Morse, C., Bonney, D., Simon, R. (2017). Documentation framework for healthcare simulation quality improvement activities. Adv Simul, 2, 19. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29450020
Brazil, V. (2017). Translational simulation: Not ‘where?’ but ‘why?’ A functional view of in situ simulation. Advances in Simulation, 2(1), 20. http://advancesinsimulation.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s41077-017-0052-3
Couto, T., Barreto, J., Marcon, F., Mafra, A., Accorsi, T. (2018) Detecting latent safety threats in an interprofessional training that combines in situ simulation with task training in an emergency department. Advances in Simulation 3(23). https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s41077-018-0083-4
Dadiz, R., Riccio, J., Brown, K. Emrich P, Robin B, & Bender J. (2020). Qualitative analysis of latent safety threats uncovered by in situ simulation-based operations testing before moving into a single-family-room neonatal intensive care unit. J Perinatol, 40, 29–35. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41372-020-0749-3
Eppich, W., & Cheng, A. (2015). Promoting Excellence and Reflective Learning in Simulation (PEARLS): Development and rationale for a blended approach to health care simulation debriefing. Simulation in Healthcare, 10(2), 106-115.
Heart and Stroke (2020). Highlights of the 2020 American Heart Association Guidelines for CPR and ECC. Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada edition. https://heartandstroke.my.salesforce.com/sfc/p/#A0000000BYzI/a/2K000003BAno/8.4yscv4fAnC2teMm3Y8fnNZljICUf_W6pD1b.RKNyk
Gaba, D. M. (2007). The future vision of simulation in healthcare. Simulation in Healthcare: Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare, 2(2).
Issenberg, S. B., McGaghie, W. C., Petrusa, E.R. et al. (2005). Features and uses of high-fidelity medical simulations that lead to effective learning: A BEME systematic review. Med Teach, 27(1), 10–28.
James, J. T. (2013). A new, evidence-based estimate of patient harms associated with hospital care. Journal of Patient Safety, 9(3), 122-128.
Kaba, A., Dube, M., Charania, I., Donahue, M. (2018). Collaborative practice in action: Building interprofessional competencies through simulation-based education and novel approaches to team training. Health Education and Care, 3(2), 1-9.
Knight, P., MacGloin, H., Lane, M., Lofton, L., Desai, A., Haxby, E., et al. (2018). Mitigating latent threats identified through an embedded in situ simulation program and their comparison to patient safety incidents: A retrospective review. Front Pediatr, 5(281). http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29473026
Nickson, C., Petrosoniak, A., Barwick, S., & Brazil, V. (2021). Translational simulation: From description to action. Adv Simul, 6(1), 6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41077-021-00160-6
Ogrinc, G., Davies, L., Goodman, D., Batalden, P., Davidoff, F., & Stevens, D. (2015). SQUIRE 2.0 (Standards for QUality Improvement Reporting Excellence): Revised publication guidelines from a detailed consensus process. Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing, 46(11). https://doi.org/10.3928/00220124-20151020-02
Patterson, M. D., Geis, G. L., Falcone, R. A., LeMaster, T., Wears, R. L. (2013). In situ simulation: Detection of safety threats and teamwork training in a high-risk emergency department. BMJ Qual Saf, 22(6), 468–77. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23258390
Petrosoniak, A., Auerbach, M., Wong, A. H., Hicks, C. M. (2017). In situ simulation in emergency medicine: Moving beyond the simulation lab. Emerg Med Australas. https://doi.org/10.1111/1742-6723.12705
Petrosoniak. A., Almeida, R., Pozzobon, L. D., Hicks, C., Fan, M., White, K., McGowan, M., & Trbovich, P. (2019). Tracking workflow during high-stakes resuscitation: The application of a novel clinician movement tracing tool during in situ trauma simulation. BMJ Simulation and Technology Enhanced Learning, 5, 78-84. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjstel-2017-000300
Reason, J. (2000). Human error: Models and management. BMJ, 320, 768. https://www.bmj.com/content/320/7237/768?ath_user=efschouston002&ath_ttok=%253CTPEEDaMygDfSrj8WwQ%253E
Rodziewicz, T., Houseman, B., & Hipskind, J. (2021). Medical error reduction and prevention. StatPearls Publishing. PMID: 29763131 Bookshelf ID: NBK499956
Salas, E. et al. (2009). What are the critical success factors for team training in health care? https://www.jointcommissionjournal.com/article/S1553-7250(09)35056-4/pdf
Stang, A. S., Wingert, A. S., Hartling, L., & Plint, A. C. (2013). Adverse events related to emergency department care: A systematic review. PloS one, 8(9).
Van Beuzekom, M., Boer, F., Akerboom, S., & Hudson, P. (2010). Patient safety: Latent risk factors. https://bjanaesthesia.org/article/S0007-0912(17)33566-3/pdf
Wetzel, E. A., Lang, T. R., Pendergrass, T. L., Taylor, R. G., Geis, G. L. (2013). Identification of latent safety threats using high-fidelity simulation-based training with multidisciplinary neonatology teams. Jt Comm J Qual patient Saf, 39(6), 268–73. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23789165
Zimmerman, K. (2015). Inter-professional in-situ simulated team and resuscitation training for patient safety: Description and impact of a programmatic approach. https://bmcmededuc.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12909-015-0472-5
Téléchargements
Publié-e
Comment citer
Numéro
Rubrique
Licence
© Domhnall O Dochartaigh 2022
Cette œuvre est sous licence Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International.
The Canadian Journal of Emergency Nursing is published Open Access under a Creative Commons CC-BY 4.0 license. Authors retain full copyright.
